tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36480259.post2495104540525217901..comments2007-12-04T07:24:39.273-05:00Denysehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16066837660957290645noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36480259.post-9260544025947534822007-12-04T05:45:00.000-05:002007-12-04T05:45:00.000-05:00You would think that such a mind like Flew’s that he would rightly understand what type of God he is adhering to. But if you listen to the short (5-min. or so) interview of him by Lee Strobel, Flew seems to give this “deistic God” / “Aristotelian Mind” attributes that are larger than those definitions. It seems impossible for him – and others – to <B>not</B> give these attributes to God just a pro-choicer cannot refer to <I>themselves</I> in non-personal terms when they were in the womb. Or likewise a Hindu being incapable of – when explaining his philosophy – telling me why one mind (mine) should listen to another mind (his) as to why no minds exist. This is telling.Papa Giorgiohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14046222162630611579noreply@blogger.com